Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Google Instant Pages vs. Analytics Software

  1. #1
    give tail! Dario's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Hood
    El Mundo
    Posts
    16,226
    Pimp $
    100,883

    Google Instant Pages vs. Analytics Software

    Last week Google released Instant Pages for Chrome which tries to predict which search result a user will click and then pre-renders that page making it load instantly for the end user when clicked.

    It looks pretty cool on video but there is a potential problem with this update and analytics software. If a user does not click on the search result that was predicted the page has loaded for nothing and the tracker may pick it up as a visitor even though the page was never actually displayed to the user.

    The effect would be more traffic with lower % of new visitors and higher bounce rate.


    Is anyone here seeing this?
    “Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming “Wow! What a Ride!’” — Hunter S. Thompson

  2. #2
    I'm the one on top! Cane Toad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    544
    Pimp $
    571
    Ugh! Something weird is going on, but for me its been longer than that. In July and this month we bought some traffic and the provider seemed to be playing fairly, and I still think that they are playing fairly. The weird thing is that since I checked my hits by browser I am having an very unlikely amount of traffic via Chrome browsers. Something like 7 to 5 hits for Chrome vs 2 hits for the next two browsers combined. This has not changed since last week. Could they (Google) have been doing something like this sooner?

    Side note: Has any one noted their data for Internet Explorer failing to include the source / medium for hits?

  3. #3
    Banned smutnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,770
    Pimp $
    -5,000
    Things are starting to get a little better for me. That's weird.

  4. #4
    I'm the one on top! Cane Toad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    544
    Pimp $
    571
    Well the http:// version of my site did go up to a PR2.

  5. #5
    Whatthefuckever MP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    63,055
    Pimp $
    27,697
    And the traffic keeps going up...

  6. #6
    I'm the one on top! Cane Toad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    544
    Pimp $
    571
    Not the search traffic, its staying the same, but the returning traffic has been gradually growing.


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •